Germano v. Dzurenda et al
| Paul Robert Germano |
| James Dzurenda, Kathy Cassidy, Oliveira, Kristine Matthews, Palmieri, Bill Kompare, Patricia Ottollini, Mark Strange, Kathy Benner and Dan Bannish |
| 3:2009cv01316 |
| August 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER denying without prejudice 47 Motion for preliminary injunction; denying 57 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 61 Motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/30/11. (Hungerford, A.)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/28/11. (Hungerford, A.)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 34 Motion for Default Entry 55(a); denying without prejudice 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying without prejudice 46 Motion for Conference; denying as moot 48 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying [18 ] Motion for TRO/Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying without prejudice 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. ORDER granting 37 Motion for Extension of Time. Discovery shall be completed by November 21, 2010. Dispositive motions shall be filed by December 21, 2010. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 08/20/2010. (Wolf, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
