Briscoe v. New Haven
| Michael Briscoe |
| City Of New Haven |
| 3:2009cv01642 |
| October 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Charles S. Haight, Jr. |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
311
ORDER (see attached) - Plaintiff's present Motion for Reconsideration, 310 , is GRANTED. The Court's February 21, 2014 Ruling and Order, 309 , is MODIFIED by DELETING Paragraph 5 from page 7. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 3/12/14. (Hornstein, A)
|
|
Filing
309
RULINGS (see attached) on Parties' Motions Regarding Protective Order and Sealed Documents. Plaintiff's 292 Motion to Amend/Correct the Court's 49 Order on Motion for Protective Order is DENIED AS WITHDRAWN. Plaintiff's [298 ] Motion to Withdraw Plaintiff's 292 Motion to Amend/Correct the Court's 49 Order is GRANTED. The Intervenors' 299 Motion for an Order to Remedy Unauthorized Filing of Sealed Material Order is DENIED. Plaintiff's 302 Motion to Seal the 105 written 2003 exam nunc pro tunc is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 21, 2014. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
291
RULING (see attached) denying 286 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend his complaint in accordance with his proposed 286 -1 Fourth Amended Complaint. The First Claim in Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint [Doc. [199 ]-2], the operative pleading in the case, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO FURTHER REPLEAD. The Second Claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 14, 2013.(Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
285
RULING (see attached) denying 282 Plaintiff's self-styled "Motion to Amend" as a nullity and granting 282 Plaintiff's "Motion to Defer Judgment" pending the Court's ruling on a motion to amend in "proper form," which Plaintiff, if so advised, must file on or before September 23, 2013. If such a motion is timely filed, and thereafter opposed, the entry of judgment will abide the event. If no timely Rule 15 motion is filed, judgment dismissing the Third Amended Complaint will be entered forthwith. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 12, 2013. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
281
RULING (see attached) denying 224 Motions of Defendant and Intervenors to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint as time barred, but granting the motions, dismissing Plaintiff's Title VII claim with prejudice, on substantive grounds for failing to state a valid claim, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Having dismissed Plaintiff's sole federal claim, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his municipal law claim, which is dismissed without prejudice. In light of this Ruling, the remaining pending motions [Doc. 248 , 254 , 255 , 280 ] are hereby denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 9, 2013. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
226
RULING denying 207 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on December 18, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
221
RULING granting 199 Motion to Amend/Correct. See attached Ruling. The operative complaint in this action is now the Third Amended Complaint [Doc. 199-2]. The date of its filing and service is deemed to be the date of this Ruling's entry. Defendant is directed to answer the Third Amended Complaint within the time specified by Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on November 9, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
160
RULING denying 153 Motion to Permit Use of Test Questions. See attached Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on April 9, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER SUBSTITUTING CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OF OPINION: In order to reflect certain minor corrections made in conformity with today's Order 122 on Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, the Memorandum of Opinion 101 dated April 28, 2010 dismissing the case is hereby withdrawn, and the attached corrected Memorandum of Opinion dismissing the case is hereby issued to replace it. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 12, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER (see attached) granting 52 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; denying 63 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend; denying as moot 70 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 71 Plaintiff's Motion to Conduct Dis covery and Modify Protective Order; denying as moot 30 Sean Patton's Motion to Intervene; denying as moot 75 Sean Patton's Motion for an Order; denying as moot 77 Matthew Marcarelli's Motion to Intervene; denying as moot 81 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Opinion to follow. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 21, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER (see attached) summarizing today's telephone conference regarding the April 19 hearing and setting forth the deadlines going forward. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 14, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (see attached) relating to the hearing to be held April 19, 2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 12, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER (see attached) relating to the hearing to be held April 19, 2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 7, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER (see attached) denying 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order, and granting 46 Defendant's Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 25, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER (see attached) granting 34 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and/or Clarification, but, upon reconsideration, adhering to the prior ruling. In light of Defendant's request for clarification of the term "immediate," D efendant is ordered to make the limited discovery disclosures specified in this and the prior ruling on or before January 21, 2010. Furthermore, if the parties are unable to agree on a form of protective order, they shall file with the Court on or before January 21, 2010 their proposed forms of such an order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 12, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER (see attached) granting in part and denying in part 8 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery, and granting in part and denying in part 12 Defendant's Motion to Stay. Plaintiff shall be provided certain limited discovery immediate ly. The remainder of discovery is hereby stayed until a ruling on Briscoe's motion to intervene in Ricci is issued. Defendant's requests for a stay until a ruling on the promised motion to dismiss, or until resolution of the Ricci case, are denied. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on December 23, 2009. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Briscoe v. New Haven | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Briscoe | |
| Represented By: | David N. Rosen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City Of New Haven | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
