Kopperl v. Bain et al
| Andrew D. Kopperl |
| Kent S. Bain, Vintage Racing Svc, Inc and Automotive Restoration, Inc |
| 3:2009cv01754 |
| October 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Charles S. Haight, Jr. |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
RULING (see attached) denying Plaintiff's [Doc. 93 ] Motion for Reconsideration and granting Defendants' [Doc. 100 ] Motion to Dismiss Fourteenth and Fifteenth Counts of Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Verified Complaint. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 26, 2016. (Overbey, C.)
|
|
Filing
90
RULING (see attached) granting in part and denying in part 36 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. If Plaintiff decides to further amend his Complaint in a manner consistent with the attached Ruling, he must file the amended pleading on or before June 27, 2014. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 2, 2014. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
88
RULING (see attached) denying 38 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of 35 Ruling on 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Amended Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 6, 2014. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
87
Ruling on Pending Discovery Motions: 55 Motion for Protective Order is granted in limited part, without prejudice to reconsideration if Judge Haight reinstates Count Nine of defendants' Amended Counterclaims at a later time; and 59 Motion f or Protective Order and 59 Motion to Quash are granted also without prejudice to reconsideration if Judge Haight reinstates Count Nine of defendants' Amended Counterclaims at a later time. See Attached. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 5/1/2014. (Watson, M.)
|
|
Filing
65
RULING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES: counsel shall forward a status report, either jointly or individually, to this Magistrate Judge's Chambers with respect to their progress by 1/31/2012. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 1/17/2012. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
35
RULING (see attached) granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims of Certain Defendants. All counterclaims except Count Two are dismissed. However, leave to replead is granted with respect to all counterclaims except Counts One and Nine. Any repleaded counterclaims must be filed and served not later than September 22, 2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on August 30, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Regarding Insufficiency of Jurisdictional Allegations. (See attached.) Plaintiff is directed to file and serve an amended complaint not later than November 30, 2009, containing sufficient jurisdictional allegations with respect to himself and D efendants. Plaintiff is also ordered to serve a copy of this order on Defendants on or before November 30, 2009. All proceedings in the case are STAYED pending the filing of an amended complaint in conformity with this Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 9, 2009. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
