Thompson v. Rizzitelli et al
| Mel Thompson |
| Sam Rizzitelli, Shelia Parizo, Sandy Watson, James Watson, Dan Sexton, Anita Duggatto, Christine Robinson, Ronald Sill, Joyce Sill, Paul Varsanik, Jr., John Orazietti and Derby Democratic Town Committee |
| 3:2010cv00071 |
| January 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Joan G. Margolis |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
186
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S BANKRUPTCY. Joint Status Report due by June 28, 2012. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 6/4/2012. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
171
RULING: granting to the extent set forth in attached ruling 156 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 1/13/2012. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER: granting in part, to the extent that the deposition scheduled for January 17, 2012 is hereby postponed, to be scheduled at a later date pursuant to Court Order 165 Emergency Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 1/12/2012. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
133
RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATIONS FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY AGAINST DEFENDANT CHRISTINE ROBINSON: denying 75 Motion for Prejudgment Remedy; denying 81 Motion for Prejudgment Remedy; denying 84 Motion for Prejudgment Remedy. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 10/14/2011. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER: granting 111 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff shall respond on or before September 2, 2011. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 8/10/2011. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER: Defendants' Motion 32 to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in Part. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 03/29/2011. (Budris, K.)
|
|
Filing
72
SEE ATTACHED ELECTRONIC ORDER denying without prejudice as moot Dkt #68 Motion to Dismiss; and granting until 3/31/11, without prejudice to defendants seeking an extension thereof, if Judge Arterton has not filed a ruling by that date, Dkt. #70 Motion to Extend Stay of Discovery (See Attached Electronic Order). THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE THE COURT WILL ISSUE. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 2/7/2011. (Watson, M.)
|
|
Filing
67
SEE ATTACHED ELECTRONIC ENDORSEMENT ORDER: granting 62 Defendants' Motion for Order such that discovery is stayed until January 18, 2011, without prejudice to defendants seeking an extension (See Attached Order); denying 63 Defendants' Motion for Order (See Attached Order); and denying without prejudice to renew after January 18, 2011 66 plaintiff's Motion to Compel (See Attached Order). THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE THE COURT WILL ISSUE. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 11/23/2010. (Watson, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
