Local 676 UA et al v. United Assn of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus et al
| Local 676 UA, John Livingstone and Michael Livingstone |
| United Assn of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus, William P. Hite, General Executive BD, Kenneth Aurecchia, James Sullivan, Kenneth Broadbent, Sid Stolper, Billy Borchert and John Telford |
| 3:2010cv00123 |
| January 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER denying the Plaintiffs' 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, see attached memorandum of decision; denying as premature the Plaintiffs' 6 Motion for Permanent Injunction, as the standard for a permanent injunction is essentially th e same as the standard for a preliminary injunction, except that the moving party, instead of showing a likelihood of success on the merits must show actual success on the merits. Amoco Prod. Co. v. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n. 12 (1987). The parties are referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas P. Smith for a settlement conference and are instructed to file Dispositive Motions regarding the Plaintiffs' allegations and request for permanent Injunctive relief, if any, by October 29, 2010. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 9/15/10. (Johnson, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
