Calhoun v. Blumenthal et al
| Raymond Calhoun |
| Richard Blumenthal, O'Holoran, Ann Marie LNU, R. Rockelle, Brian Murphy, N. Hein, Walter Ford, Hanna and Elderkin |
| 3:2010cv00180 |
| February 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached memorandum of decision. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on March 28, 2012. (Butler, Ayanna)
|
|
Filing
35
PRISCS - RULING denying 27 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/12/11. (Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing
14
PRISCS - RULING. denying without prejudice 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/20/10. (Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing
11
PRISCS - RULING and ORDER granting 6 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 7 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 8 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying without prejudice as moot 10 Motion for Default Entry 55(a).Plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint by 9/7/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 8/10/2010. (Simpson, T.) Modified on 8/11/2010 TO EDIT TEXT TO INCLUDE THE DATE THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DUE (Simpson, T.).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
