Caro v. Weintraub et al
| Marshall Caro |
| David Weintraub and Eric Weintraub |
| 3:2010cv00284 |
| February 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Charles S Haight |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Lynch, K.) |
| Filing 48 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case With Prejudice by Marshall Caro, David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Sussman, Eric) |
Filing 47
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #46 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for the parties' briefs on the diversity jurisdiction issue is June 8, 2012. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on May 25, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
| Filing 46 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 8, 2012 respond to Court's 5/4/2012 Ruling #45 Order by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Dowd, Glenn) |
| Filing 45 RULING: See attached Ruling. The Court directs that, on or before May 25, 2012, the parties file and serve written submissions as directed in the Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on May 4, 2012. (Caldwell, M.) |
|
Filing 44
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #42 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Peter K. Rydel terminated. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on April 16, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
| Filing 43 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn William Dowd on behalf of David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub (Dowd, Glenn) |
| Filing 42 MOTION for Peter Rydel to Withdraw as Attorney by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Falcone, K.) |
|
Filing 41
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying as moot #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Entry pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) against Defendants for failure to plead or otherwise defend. Defendants filed an Answer [Doc. 15] the same day that Plaintiff filed his motion to re-open [Doc. 16] the instant motion for default. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 28, 2011. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 40 NOTICE by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub re #39 Trial Memo (Cover Sheet To Defendants' Trial Memorandum) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rydel, Peter) |
| Filing 39 TRIAL MEMO by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub Estimated trial time 3 days. (Rydel, Peter) |
| Filing 38 TRIAL MEMO by Marshall Caro Estimated trial time 2 days. (Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 37 RESPONSE re #34 Objection, filed by Marshall Caro. (Malone, P.) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Dispositive Motions due by 10/25/2010 Trial Brief due by 10/25/2010 (Pesta, J.) |
|
Filing 36
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff having stated that he does not object [See Doc. 35], Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time #32 until October 25, 2010 of the deadline for filing either a dispositive motion or a joint trial memorandum is hereby granted. The trial ready date shall be thirty (30) days after the joint trial memorandum is filed. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 28, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 35 REPLY TO #32 MOTION for Extension of Time until October 25, 2010 to Extend Dispositive Motion, Trial Ready, and Joint Trial Memorandum Deadlines to evaluate whether to file a motion for summary judgment and, in the event they do not file a summary judgment filed by Marshall Caro. (Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 34 REPLY re #32 MOTION for Extension of Time until October 25, 2010 to Extend Dispositive Motion, Trial Ready, and Joint Trial Memorandum Deadlines to evaluate whether to file a motion for summary judgment and, in the event they do not file a summary judgment filed by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rydel, Peter) Modified on 9/28/2010 (Pesta, J.). |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #32 MOTION for Extension of Time, Responses due by 9/28/2010 (Pesta, J.) |
|
Filing 33
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff shall file his response, if any, to Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time [Doc. 32] on or before September 28, 2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 23, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 32 MOTION for Extension of Time until October 25, 2010 to Extend Dispositive Motion, Trial Ready, and Joint Trial Memorandum Deadlines to evaluate whether to file a motion for summary judgment and, in the event they do not file a summary judgment motion, to prepare a joint trial memorandum 21 Scheduling Order by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Rydel, Peter) |
| Filing 31 REPLY to Response to #22 Motion for Compelling Withdrawal of Defendants Counsel Order filed by Marshall Caro. (Falcone, K.) |
| Filing 30 Memorandum in Opposition re #22 MOTION for COMPELLING WITHDRAWAL OF DEFENDANTS COUNSEL Order filed by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Malone, P.) |
| Filing 29 Memorandum in Opposition re #22 MOTION for COMPELLING WITHDRAWL OF DEFENDANTS COUNSEL Order filed by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Gothers, M.) |
|
Filing 28
ELECTRONIC ORDER terminating #27 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time. This is a duplicate of #25 , which was granted yesterday. 26 Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on July 27, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing 26
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #25 Defendants' Consented to Motion for Extension of Time until August 23, 2010 to Respond to #22 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Withdrawal of Defendants' Counsel. No additional extensions of this deadline will be granted. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 26, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 27 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION for COMPELLING WITHDRAWL OF DEFENDANTS COUNSEL Order until 8/23/2010 by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Falcone, K.) |
| Filing 25 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION for COMPELLING WITHDRAWL OF DEFENDANTS COUNSEL Order until August 23, 2010 by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Rydel, Peter) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #22 MOTION for COMPELLING WITHDRAWL OF DEFENDANTS COUNSEL Order. Responses due by 7/23/2010 (Pesta, J.) |
|
Filing 24
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #23 Defendants' Consented to Motion for Extension of Time until July 23, 2010 to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Withdrawl of Defendants' Counsel #22 . Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on June 24, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 23 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/23/10 to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Withdrawal of Defendants' Counsel #22 MOTION for COMPELLING WITHDRAWL OF DEFENDANTS COUNSEL Order by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Rydel, Peter) Modified on 6/28/2010 to correct motion event (Malone, P.). |
| Filing 22 MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING WITHDRAWL OF DEFENDANTS COUNSEL by Marshall Caro. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2Attachments A-E)(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 21
ELECTRONIC SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/27/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 9/25/2010. Trial Brief due by 9/25/2010. Trial Ready Date 9/25/2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 19, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing 20
ELECTRONIC ORDER approving the Rule 26(f) Report and adopting the deadlines set forth therein. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 19, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 19 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Rydel, Peter) |
|
Filing 18
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #16 Plaintiff's Letter Motion to Re-Open #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Entry pursuant to Rule 55(a). This Order does not grant the default but merely re-opens the motion.Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 31, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 17 OBJECTION re #9 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to David Weintraub and Eric Weintraub filed by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Rydel, Peter) |
| Filing 16 LETTER MOTION to re-open #9 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to David Weintraub and Eric Weintraub by Marshall Caro. (Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub.(Rydel, Peter) |
|
Filing 13
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #12 Motion to Withdraw Appearance of Mark F. Katz as Attorney for Plaintiff Marshall Caro. Attorney Mark F. Katz terminated. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 24, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 14 CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC NOTICE by Marshall Caro (Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Mark F. Katz to Withdraw as Attorney by Marshall Caro. (Katz, Mark) |
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying as moot #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Entry 55(a) as to Defendants David Weintraub and Eric Weintraub. Because Plaintiff attempted to file this motion pro se while he remains represented by counsel, the motion is hereby denied as moot, without prejudice to re-filing by Plaintiff's counsel of record, or by Plaintiff himself once Plaintiff's current counsel withdraws his appearance. A copy of this ruling, as well as today's related Order [Doc. 10], have been mailed by chambers to Plaintiff's home address, in addition to being served electronically on counsel of record for all parties. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 19, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff Marshall Caro has attempted to file an appearance pro se in this matter. [See Doc. 8] However, a party may not appear pro se when he is already represented by counsel. Attorney Mark F. Katz was counsel of record when this case was removed to federal court from state court, and he is and will remain counsel of record in this matter, with the attendant responsibilities to his client, unless and until he files a motion to withdraw and the Court grants it. Plaintiff may not submit filings pro se while he remains represented by counsel. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 19, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to David Weintraub and Eric Weintraub by Marshall Caro. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Proposed Entry of Default)(Kelsey, N.) |
| Filing 8 Appearance Pro Se by Marshall Caro (Kelsey, N.) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 2/25/2010. (Kelsey, N.)
|
|
Filing 6
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Discovery due by 8/27/2010. Signed by Clerk on 2/25/2010. (Kelsey, N.)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of No Pending Motions by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub (Kelsey, N.) |
| Filing 4 Statement of Removal by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub (Kelsey, N.) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Filing and Service of Notice of Removal by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub (Kelsey, N.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter K. Rydel on behalf of David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub (Attachments: #1 State Court Notice of Appearance)(Kelsey, N.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford, case number FST-CV10-6003590S. Filing fee $350 receipt number N029720, filed by David Weintraub, Eric Weintraub. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibits B-D, #3 Exhibit E: Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Kelsey, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
