Weber v. FUJIFILM Med Sys USA Inc et al
| John J. Weber |
| FUJIFILM Med Sys USA Inc, Hiroaki Tada and FUJIFILM Holdings Amer Corp |
| 3:2010cv00401 |
| March 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
570
ORDER: Plaintiff's Objections 566 to Defendants' Bill of Costs are SUSTAINED. Defendants are not the prevailing party and are therefore not entitled to recover costs arising out of this litigation. Plaintiff is entitled to his costs to be paid by Defendant FMSU. Defendants' Objections 567 to Plaintiff's Bill of Costs are SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part. Plaintiff shall not recover the costs of synchronization of the video depositions or the cost of Charles Leslies video deposition which was not used at trial. Plaintiff is therefore awarded $33,691.80 in costs to be paid by FMSU. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/13/15.(Harris, J)
|
|
Filing
533
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion 523 for Assessment of Lost Wages is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion 526 for Oral Argument on that motion is also DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Prejudgment Remedy 528 is GRANTED in the amount of $7 77,131.12. Plaintiff's Motion 529 for Disclosure of Assets is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion 519 to Correct is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to amend the judgment to reflect an award of prejudgment interest in the amount of $55,592 .68, for a total award of $772,949.68. Defendants are directed to post a supersedeas bond, which will also satisfy their obligation to post a bond in order to stay the effect of the prejudgment remedy, in the amount of $777,131.12. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/16/2013. (Bonneau, J)
|
|
Filing
518
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motions 478 479 for Assessment of Prejudgment Interest are GRANTED in part; Plaintiff's 480 Motion for Clarification is DENIED as moot; Defendants' Motion 484 for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED; Defe ndants' Motion 485 for Remittitur is DENIED; Defendants' Motion 486 for New Trial is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion 488 for Assessment of Lost Wages is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion 489 for New Trial is DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/19/2013. (Bonneau, J)
|
|
Filing
322
RULING GRANTING IN PART AND DENIED IN PART re 254 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FUJIFILM Corp, 253 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FUJIFILM Holdings Amer Corp, 252 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FUJIFILM Med Sys USA Inc, Hiroaki Tada. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/24/12. (Torday, B.)
|
|
Filing
269
RULING ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS: defendants shall produce copies of emails (specified in ruling) to plaintiff, if plaintiff does not already have copies, on or before August 22, 2011. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 8/16/2011. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
265
RULING ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS: granting in limited part and denying in large part 198 Motion to Compel Discovery and for Cost and Fees; granting in part and denying in part 238 Second Motion to Compel Discovery and for Rule 37 Relief; granting 242 Motion to Seal Confidential Documents. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/27/2011. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
237
ORDER for Mental Examination of Plaintiff John J. Weber. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 04/04/2011. (Budris, K.)
|
|
Filing
233
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss 119 FMSU's Counterclaims is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 02/28/2011. (Budris, K.)
|
|
Filing
227
ORDER: Defendants' Motion 152 to Compel Discovery Responses and for Costs and Fees is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 02/17/2011. (Budris, K.)
|
|
Filing
220
ORDER: Defendant FujiFilm Holdings Corporation's Motion to Dismiss 129 for Lack of Jurisdiction is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 02/04/2011.(Budris, K.)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 60 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 01/21/2011. (Budris, K.)
|
|
Filing
146
ENDORSEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER denying, as moot 111 Motion for Clarification; granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion to Expedite; granting as to pre filing conference and denying as to 110 Motion to Stay discovery; denying, moot [120 ] Motion for Leave to File; denying, as moot 121 Motion to Dismiss; denying, as moot 123 Motion to Dismiss; denying 132 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 132 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting, 145 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to motion to dismiss [#129]. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/5/10. (Torday, B.)
|
|
Filing
99
RULING: granted in part and denied in part 63 Motion for Court Approval of Counsel's Contact with Former Employees of Defendants; granted in part and denied in part 76 Cross-Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/19/2010. (Rodko, B.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
