Morlando v. Social Security Admin
Plaintiff: Donald Frank Morlando
Defendant: Social Security Admin
Case Number: 3:2010cv01258
Filed: August 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Mark R. Kravitz
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting 31 Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner; granting 31 Motion to Remand to Agency; denying 33 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 9/20/11. (Brown, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morlando v. Social Security Admin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Frank Morlando
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Admin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?