Vera v. Waterbury Hosp
Plaintiff: James Vera
Defendant: Waterbury Hosp
Case Number: 3:2010cv01417
Filed: September 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Waterbury Hosp. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 3/28/13. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
November 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 11/16/2010. (Cepler, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vera v. Waterbury Hosp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Vera
Represented By: William Sylvester Palmieri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Waterbury Hosp
Represented By: Sarah S. Healey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?