SiTec GMBH v. PTR-91, Inc.
Plaintiff: SiTec GMBH
Defendant: PTR-91, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv01806
Filed: November 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Chatigny
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER : See attached order. A telephonic status conference is scheduled for 12/16/2010 at 2:00 PM with Judge Donna F. Martinez. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference call and shall have opposing counsel on the line when calling chambers at (860) 240 3605. (Constantine, A.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SiTec GMBH v. PTR-91, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SiTec GMBH
Represented By: David T. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PTR-91, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?