Wasilewski v. Raymond Corporation et al
| Terry Wasilewski |
| Raymond Corporation and Abel Womack, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01857 |
| November 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
409
ORDER granting 371 Motion to Amend/Correct the Verdict by Collateral Source; granting 388 Motion for Prejudgment Interest; denying 399 Motion for Remittitur and To Strike Plaintiff's Offer of Compromise. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/31/2016. (Dearing, S.)
|
|
Filing
292
ORDER denying 183 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 184 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 185 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; granting in part and denying in part 208 Motion in Limine; granting 209 Motion to Strike ; denying 210 Motion to Strike without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 212 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 213 Motion in Limine; granting 214 Mo tion in Limine; granting 215 Motion in Limine; denying 216 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion in Limine; denying 218 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at tri al; denying 219 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 220 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 221 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; granting 222 Motion in Limine; denying 223 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 224 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 225 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 226 Motion in Limine with out prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 227 Motion in Limine; granting 228 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 229 Motion in Limine; denying 230 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; provisionally g ranting 231 Motion in Limine; granting 232 Motion in Limine; denying 233 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 234 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; granting in part and denying in part [235 ] Motion in Limine; denying 236 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 237 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; denying 238 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial; granting 239 Motion in Limine; denying 240 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal at trial. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/14/2016. (Dearing, S.)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 114 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 116 Motion to Strike. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted as to the claims of failure to warn, negligent service, and punitive damages, and denied as to the claim of design defect. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 3/3/14. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER denying 86 MOTION to Dismiss by Abel Womack. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 6/14/12. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting 70 motion to dismiss in part and finding moot in part. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to claims for attorneys fees pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-240a. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to the Count Five recklessness claims and corresponding punitive damages pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-240b. The Motion to Dismiss is MOOT as to the Count Four claims against Defendant Raymond because Raymonds Motion for Summary Judgment has been granted and Raymond is therefore no longer a party defendant. Plaintiff may e-file an Amended Complaint consistent with this ruling within 15 days of this rulings filing date. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 9/21/11. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
