New Haven v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company
| City of New Haven |
| Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania |
| 3:2010cv02047 |
| December 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Peter C. Dorsey |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: New Haven v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania | |
| Represented By: | Dennis O. Brown |
| Represented By: | Aubrey E. Ruta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: City of New Haven | |
| Represented By: | Edward W. Gasser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.