Kirkland v. Ford Motor Company
| Toni P. Kirkland |
| Ford Motor Company |
| Christopher Meisenkothen |
| 3:2010mc00132 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Donna F Martinez |
| Other |
| Motion to Quash |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE re withdrawal of subpoena by Ford Motor Company (Blue, A.) |
Filing 3
ORDER: The motions to quash #1 and for protective order #1 filed by Christopher Meisenkothen are denied without prejudice in light of the withdrawal of the subpoena at issue by the Ford Motor Company, the defendant in the underlying action pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No.09-74077. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 9/23/10. (Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez for all pretrial matters excluding trial including #1 MOTION for Protective Order, MOTION to Quash, Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/10/10. Motions referred to Donna F. Martinez(Blue, A.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash and Motion for Protective Order by Christopher Meisenkothen.Responses due by 9/24/2010 (Montgomery, A.) |
| Filing fee received from Sweeney & Griffin: $ 39.00, receipt number H031740 (Montgomery, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
