Buxbaum v. St. Vincent's Health Services, Inc. et al
| Barry Buxbaum |
| St. Vincent's Health Services, Inc., St Vincent's Medical Center, Inc. and St. Vincent's Special Needs Center, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv00117 |
| January 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER denying as moot 76 Defendants' Motion to Compel Deposition of Plaintiff; denying as moot 79 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Compel Depositions of Susan Davis and Pamela Tarulli; denying as moot 84 Defendants' Motion for Protect ive Order; and granting in part and denying in part 82 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Third Party Computer Science Corporation's Response to Subpoena Duces Tecum, as set forth in the attached Discovery Ruling. The parties' letters dated December 18 and 19, 2012 will be docketed by the Clerk. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 01/07/2013. (Katz, Samantha)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER denying 55 Motion to Compel as set forth in the attached Ruling. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 10/16/2012. (Garcia, M.)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER denying 32 Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 8/6/12. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
