Sheppard v. McGill et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence Sheppard
Defendant: Jeffrey McGill
Case Number: 3:2011cv00180
Filed: February 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New London
Presiding Judge: Stefan R. Underhill
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 RULING denying without prejudice 37 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 38 Motion for Request for Joint Trial Memorandum; granting 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel for Settlement purposes only ; denying as moot 40 Motion for Extension of Time ; denying without prejudice to re-filing after the settlement conference 41 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 1/22/2013. (Oliver, T.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheppard v. McGill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey McGill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Sheppard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?