Bourne v. Middletown, et al
Plaintiff: Christine Bourne
Defendant: City of Middletown, Michael Frechette, Nancy Haynes and Board of Education
Case Number: 3:2011cv00309
Filed: February 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Christopher F. Droney
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 152 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. # 92 , # 93 ) are granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 97 ) is denied, as follows: As t o Counts One and Two, the motions of the Board, the City, and plaintiff are DENIED and the motions of Frechette and Haynes are GRANTED. As to Count Three, defendant Haynes' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. As to Count Four, all parties 9; motions for summary judgment are DENIED. As to Count Five, I GRANT defendants' motions for summary judgment and DENY plaintiff's motion with respect to plaintiff's pre-transfer suspensions. With respect to plaintiff's post-susp ension transfer, I DENY the motions for summary judgment by plaintiff and the City, and GRANT the motion by the Board and Frechette. This matter shall proceed to trial as to the remainder of plaintiff's claims against all defendants. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/27/2017. (Townsend, D.)
December 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 99 RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL INDEPENDENT PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION denying 78 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Dominic J. Squatrito on 12/18/12. (Glynn, T.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bourne v. Middletown, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Bourne
Represented By: Jacques J. Parenteau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Middletown
Represented By: David S. Monastersky
Represented By: Martha Anne Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Frechette
Represented By: Michael G. Petrie
Represented By: James M. Sconzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Haynes
Represented By: Michael G. Petrie
Represented By: James M. Sconzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of Education
Represented By: Michael G. Petrie
Represented By: James M. Sconzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?