Murray v. Stratford, et al
Ellen Murray |
Town of Stratford and James Miron |
3:2011cv00629 |
April 19, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Fairfield |
Janet Bond Arterton |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 280 RULING granting in part and denying in part (Dkt. #275) Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/19/2016. (Watson, M.) |
Filing 274 RULING denying 270 Motion for a New Trial (see attached). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 4/19/2016. (Watson, M.) |
Filing 244 ORDER Following Evidentiary Hearing and Oral Argument (see Dkt. #241). (See attached). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 1/27/2016.(Watson, M.) |
Filing 239 RULING denying without prejudice as moot (Dkt. #231) Motion for Leave to File Supplement to Joint Trial Memorandum. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 1/21/2016. (Watson, M.) |
Filing 234 RULING granting 227 Motion in Limine (see attached). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 1/8/2016. (Watson, M.) |
Filing 219 RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE (Dkts. ##205-06) (see attached): granting Motion In Limine (Dkt. #205); granting in part and denying in part Motion in Limine (Dkt. #206). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 10/5/2015. (Watson, M.) |
Filing 202 RULING (see attached) denying 183 Defendant's Motion for Sanctions; denying 193 Defendant's Corrected Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/1/2015. (Watson, M.) |
Filing 154 RULING granting in part and denying in part 132 Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Anticipated Motion for Advice; granting in part and denying in part 133 Plaintiff's Motion to Determine Whether Defendant's Pre-Trial Admissions Are Conclusively Established For Trial. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/25/2014. (Watson, M.) |
Filing 146 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS (see attached). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/23/2014.(Watson, M.) |
Filing 102 RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO STRIKE: granting in part and denying in part such that summary judgment is entered in defendant Town's favor on Counts One, Two, Three and Seven, and on Count Five w ith respect to plaintiff's prior lawsuit, and summary judgment is denied on Count Five with respect to plaintiff's union membership and activity 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part such that summary judgm ent is granted on Count Eight and on Count Six with respect to plaintiff's prior lawsuit, and summary judgment is denied on Count Six with respect to plaintiff's union membership and activity 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying on Cou nts Five and Six 79 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 86 Motion to Strike; denying 87 Motion to Strike; denying 97 Motion to Strike. Counsel are to contact this Magistrate Judge's Chambers for a telephonic scheduling conference with respect to filing a Joint Trial Memorandum, jury selection, and jury trial, with respect to Counts Five and Six only, regarding plaintiff's allegations of retaliation based upon her union membership and activity.Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 2/11/2014. (Rodko, B.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.