Allah v. Milling et al
Almighty Supreme Born Allah |
Lynn Milling, Griggs, Quiros, Cahill, Powers, Fulcher, LaJoie and DcZurenda |
3:2011cv00668 |
April 26, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Tolland |
Christopher F. Droney |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER : For the reasons discussed in the attached Ruling, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff against defendants Cahill, Griggs, and Milling jointly and severally in the amount of $62,650.00. The plaintiff's c ounsel should submit his application for an award of attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 no later than thirty (30) days following the entry of Judgment. The defendants will have fourteen (14) days to respond to any such application and the plaintiff may reply within seven (7) days thereafter. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 4/4/16.(Cates, S) |
Filing 53 ORDER denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 11/19/2013. (Freuden, S.) |
Filing 4 PRISCS - INITIAL REVIEW ORDER, ( Discovery due by 3/16/2012, Dispositive Motions due by 4/16/2012), Answer updated for Cahill to 10/26/2011; DcZurenda to 10/26/2011; Fulcher to 10/26/2011; Griggs to 10/26/2011; LaJoie to 10/26/2011; Lynn Milling to 10/26/2011; Powers to 10/26/2011; Quiros to 10/26/2011. Signed by Judge Christopher F. Droney on 7/29/11. (Corriette, M.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.