Brayboy v. Bridgeport Board of Education et al
Ronnie Brayboy |
Carole Pannozzo, City of Bridgeport Board of Education and Michelle O'Dwyer |
3:2011cv01042 |
June 27, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Fairfield |
Warren W. Eginton |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER denying 95 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 7/7/2014. (Smith, M.) |
Filing 93 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court GRANTS 81 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to all counts of Plaintiff's complaint. Jury selection scheduled for June 2, 2014, and the Jury Trial are hereby cancelled. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 5/21/2014. (Smith, M.) |
Filing 88 ORDER denying 83 Motion open discovery; denying 85 Motion open discovery. In order for the Court to have an opportunity to issue a ruling on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment 81 , the Court orders Plaintiff to file a response to the M otion for Summary Judgment no later than May 13, 2014. To the extent that Defendants deem a reply brief necessary, it must be filed no later than May 16, 2014. If they do not intend to file a reply, Counsel should immediately advise the Court after reviewing Plaintiffs response. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 5/1/2014. (Smith, M.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.