Patterson v. Labor Administrator et al
| Ronald Patterson |
| Department of Labor Administrator, Employment Security Appeals Division, Lynne M. Knox, Janice T. Drombrowski and Judicial Branch |
| 3:2011cv01237 |
| August 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Christopher F. Droney |
| Thomas P. Smith |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
RULING denying 126 Motion Relief of Judgment/ Orders Documents 36,55,109,114.111,117,119,124; denying 126 Motion to Transfer/Disqualify/Recuse Judge; denying 126 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/5/2015. (Malone, P.)
|
|
Filing
117
RULING denying 114 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/1/2014. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
109
RULING granting 97 Motion for Summary Judgment; terminating as moot 108 Motion to Expedite. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/17/2014. (Malone, P.)
|
|
Filing
88
RULING denying 85 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/14/2013. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER denying 39 Motion to Amend; finding as moot 40 Motion for Extension of Time ; terminating 45 reply brief ; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/26/12. (Bauer, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
