Handsome, Inc. et al v. Monroe et al
Handsome, Inc., Todd Cascella and Mona Cascella |
Town of Monroe, Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Monroe, Scott H. Schatzlein, Richard Zini and Karen Martin |
3:2011cv01288 |
August 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Fairfield |
Christopher F. Droney |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 211 ORDER granting 170 Motion for Summary Judgment. Please see attached ruling and order for details. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 03/31/2023. (Smith, A.) |
Filing 127 ORDER: The defendants' "motion to quash or modify the subpoena duces tecum of [Attorney] Cara Ann Ceraso" 57 and the "nonparty witness's motion to quash subpoena that seeks to produce documents" 73 are granted; the plaintiffs' "motion to compel disclosure of handwritten notes of non-party deponent [Attorney] Cara Ann Ceraso" 80 is denied. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 1/31/14. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 84 ORDER: A settlement conference is scheduled for 8/27/2013 at 1:00 PM in Chambers Room 262, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Martinez. Please see attached order for important instructions. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 52 ORDER : A settlement conference is scheduled for 7/9/2013 at 1:00 PM in Chambers Room 262, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Donna F. Martinez. Please see attached order for important instructions. (Constantine, A.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.