Waller et al v. Middletown Police Dept.
| Jayrado Waller and Marcia Waller |
| Middletown Police Dept. |
| 3:2011cv01322 |
| August 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Middlesex |
| Charles S. Haight |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
RULING (see attached) GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART Defendants' 120 Motion for Reconsideration. Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED to the extent it seeks reconsideration of the Court's ruling on Count Two of the complaint, and is DENIED in all other respects. The Court's ruling denying the City's motion for summary judgment on Count Two of the complaint is VACATED and accordingly, the City's motion for judgment on that Count is GRANTED. The c ase shall proceed in a manner consistent with the Court's Order on scheduling, doc. 126. Accordingly, the parties shall file the joint trial memorandum on or before April 10, 2015. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 24, 2015. (Pylman, J.)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART Defendants' 87 , 89 and 90 Motions for Summary Judgment and 65 Motion to Dismiss. (See Ruling attached). The parties shall file their Joint Trial Memorandum on or before December 10, 2014. The case shall be trial ready by January 12, 2015. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 29, 2014. (Pylman, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
