Perry v. New Haven
Plaintiff: Ronald Perry
Defendant: City of New Haven
Case Number: 3:2011cv01485
Filed: September 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Chatigny
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/10/14. (Warden Rodgers, H.)
September 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER withdrawing 24 Motion to Compel; granting 27 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 9/6/12. (Nichols, J.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. New Haven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Perry
Represented By: John R. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New Haven
Represented By: Nicole C. Chomiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?