Lego A/S et al v. Best-Lock Construction Toys, Inc.
| Lego A/S and Lego Systems, Inc. |
| Best-Lock Construction Toys, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv01586 |
| October 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Charles S. Haight |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
220
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (see attached). The Court must defer consideration of 217 Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment as to Best-Lock Construction Toys, Inc. and Best-Lock Limited, Hong Kong because the Court is not able, on the pre sent submissions, to determine the amount, if any, Plaintiffs should receive for their attorneys' fees. If Plaintiffs wish to pursue their claim for attorneys' fees, they must on or before August 27, 2021, file supplemental submissions which comply with the governing law of the Second Circuit. See New York State Ass'n for Retarded Child., Inc. v. Carey, 711 F.2d 1136, 1148 (2d Cir. 1983). Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on August 2, 2021. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (see attached). 198 Motion to withdraw appearance of Attorney Castricone as counsel for Best-Lock is GRANTED. The Court reserves decision on motions to withdraw appearance of Attorneys Donnelly 197 and Corea 199 , pending r esponse from Best-Lock, which shall be filed no later than January 13, 2020. Pending the resolution of these motions, all scheduling deadlines in this matter (see Doc. 196 ) are VACATED, and all proceedings are STAYED. Plaintiffs' 200 Emergency Motion for Telephonic Status Conference is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on December 12, 2019. (Marienko, A.)
|
|
Filing
195
RULING (see attached). Lego's 130 motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART but DENIED as to Best-Lock's second affirmative defense of equitable estoppel. Best-Lock's 164 motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. Best-Lock's second affirmative defense of equitable estoppel will be adjudicated after a plenary bench trial. The Court will enter a separate pre-trial Order further directing the parties. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 25, 2019. (Ghosh, R.)
|
|
Filing
173
RULING (see attached). For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, Defendants' 150 Motion to Defer Consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and to Compel Production of Documents, Depositions and Supplement al Interrogatory Responses is DENIED. Best-Lock must file its opposition to Lego's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 130 ) on or before January 12, 2018. Lego may file reply papers on or before January 26, 2018. Discovery remains stayed pending this Court's resolution of the pending motions for partial summary judgment. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 12/21/2017. (Kaczmarek, S.)
|
|
Filing
143
RULING (see attached). For the reasons described in the attached Ruling, Defendants' 128 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution is DENIED and Plaintiffs' 137 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED. The Emergency Motion o f Best-Lock [Doc. 135] is GRANTED, to the extent that proceedings under Lego's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 130] are STAYED pending the additional Orders in the attached Ruling, and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects. If Best-Lock decides to refile its Rule 56(d) Motion, Best-Lock must file that motion, in a form consistent with the attached Ruling, on or before February 7, 2017. Lego may file opposing papers on or before February 21, 2017. Best-Lock may file reply papers on or before February 28, 2017. If Best-Lock does not file an additional motion, it must file its opposition to Lego's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on or before February 7, 2017. Lego may file reply p apers on or before February 21, 2017. In these circumstances, discovery will be STAYED pending this Court's resolution of Lego's pending 130 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 18, 2017. (Kahl, A)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER (see attached). In light of the parties' status report letters, the Court orders a teleconference to be scheduled for the purpose of determining the boundaries of discovery and a time table for subsequent stages of litigation. The parties are directed to confer and select a date between July 7 and 10 at 2:00pm. Parties must notify the court of its choice date by June 21, 2014. The hearing will take place in the 17th floor courtroom at 157 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 6/17/14. (Wang, S.)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER (see attached) directing counsel to deliver to the Court simultaneously letters on June 12, 2014, stating, inter alia, their perceptions of the present status of the case and recommending how the case should proceed. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 20, 2014.(Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
105
RULING (see attached) denying 102 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's 99 Ruling on 90 94 Motions for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 15, 2013. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
99
RULING granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion for Protective Order. The parties are directed to submit a protective order consistent with the attached Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on December 11, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
79
RULING denying 37 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The parties are instructed to send the Court the letters from counsel ordered on Pages 54-55 of the attached Ruling to arrive no later than July 18, 2012. See the attached Ruling for further instructions. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on July 11, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
