Casagrande v. Norm Bloom & Son, LLC

Casagrande v. Norm Bloom & Son, LLC

Plaintiff:	John Casagrande
Defendant:	Norm Bloom & Son, LLC
Case Number:	3:2011cv01918
Filed:	December 12, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Fairfield
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Haight
Nature of Suit:	Marine
Cause of Action:	46 U.S.C. § 688
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 10, 2014	Filing 42 RULING (see attached) GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Compel and for Sanctions such that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is GRANTED, and his Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice to his right to renew the motion after Defendant has disclosed the discovery items at issue perforce of this Ruling. In light of the foregoing, the SCHEDULING ORDER is amended as follows: All discovery shall be completed by January 23, 2015. Dispositive motions mu st be filed on or before February 23, 2015. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due on or before March 25, 2015, or within thirty (30) days after the Court rules on the last-filed dispositive motion, whichever is later. The ca se shall be trial ready on or before April 24, 2015, or within thirty (30) days after the joint trial memorandum is filed, whichever is later. At any point in this schedule, as directed by Magistrate Judge Garfinkel, counsel may contact his chambers to schedule another settlement conference in this matter. See Doc. 39. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 10, 2014. (Pylman, J.)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 10, 2014

Filing 42 RULING (see attached) GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Compel and for Sanctions such that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is GRANTED, and his Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice to his right to renew the motion after Defendant has disclosed the discovery items at issue perforce of this Ruling. In light of the foregoing, the SCHEDULING ORDER is amended as follows: All discovery shall be completed by January 23, 2015. Dispositive motions mu st be filed on or before February 23, 2015. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due on or before March 25, 2015, or within thirty (30) days after the Court rules on the last-filed dispositive motion, whichever is later. The ca se shall be trial ready on or before April 24, 2015, or within thirty (30) days after the joint trial memorandum is filed, whichever is later. At any point in this schedule, as directed by Magistrate Judge Garfinkel, counsel may contact his chambers to schedule another settlement conference in this matter. See Doc. 39. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 10, 2014. (Pylman, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Casagrande v. Norm Bloom & Son, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Casagrande
Represented By:	Kenneth Wynne Bohonnon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Norm Bloom & Son, LLC
Represented By:	Wesley S. Chused
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?