Gomez v. Moore et al
| Rick Gomez |
| Metropolitan District, Michael Jefferson and Robert Moore |
| 3:2011cv01934 |
| December 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Tolland |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER; Defendant's Motion 99 for Reconsideration re Order 95 on Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 6/18/2014. (Morril, Gregory)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER; Defendant's Motion 63 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on Counts One and Four, the discriminatory discharge claim in Count Two, and the retaliatory failure to rehire claims in Counts Three and Five; and it is DENIED on the retaliatory discharge claims in Counts Two, Three and Five. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/27/2014. (Morril, Gregory)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER denying 71 Motion for Reconsideration of the Substituted Ruling 70 on Objections to the June 10, 2013 Discovery Ruling. Defendant is ORDERED to produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' Request for Production Nos. 8 and 10 by December 23, 2013. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 11/27/13. (Morril, Gregory)
|
|
Filing
50
RULING ON DISCOVERY ISSUES. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 6/10/2013.(Rodko, B.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
