Allen et al v. Verizon Wireless et al
Plaintiff: Queen Allen and Waltrina R. Whitman
Defendant: Verizon Wireless, Metlife and MLS
Case Number: 3:2012cv00482
Filed: March 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Holly B. Fitzsimmons
Presiding Judge: Janet C. Hall
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 288 RULING granting re 281 MOTION for Reconsideration re 274 Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, Order on Sealed Motion, Order on Motion to Strike, filed by Verizon Wireless Upon reconsideration, Verizons Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 207) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 8/10/2015. (Malone, P.)
June 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 274 RULING terminating as moot 204 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part and denying in part 207 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 212 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 244 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting 245 Motio n for Leave to File; granting 247 Sealed Motion; granting 249 Sealed Motion; denying 268 Motion to Strike. The remaining claim - Allen's claim against Verizon for FMLA interference based on her February/March 2010 FMLA request - will proceed to trial. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/23/2015. (Lewis, D)
October 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 166 RULING granting 139 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/25/2013. (Perez, J.)
June 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 131 RULING granting in part and denying in part 91 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 93 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 98 Motion to Dismiss; denying 125 Motion to Strike ; granting 128 Motion for Leave to File; denying 129 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/6/13. (Torrenti, R.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen et al v. Verizon Wireless et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Queen Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Waltrina R. Whitman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Wireless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metlife
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MLS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?