Genn v. New Haven Board of Education et al
| Nancy Genn |
| New Haven Board of Education, Reginald Mayo, Typhanie Jackson, Patricia Moore and Kathryn Carbone |
| 3:2012cv00704 |
| May 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Charles S. Haight |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER (see attached) granting, as modified, Plaintiff's 53 Amended Motion for Award of Attorney Fees. The Defendants are thereby ORDERED to transmit to the Plaintiff the amount of $1,008.00, representing reasonable attorney's fees as to the single substantive issue on which Plaintiff prevailed. Defendants must certify with the Court, by affidavit, full compliance with the terms of this ruling on or before Monday, July 31, 2017. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 17, 2017. (Pskowski, R.)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER (see attached) denying, without prejudice, Plaintiff's 50 Motion for Award of Attorney Fees, for failure to comply with this Court's prior 49 Ruling, which authorized its submission. If Plaintiff wishes to recover a ttorney fees in this matter, she is directed to file, on or before Friday, June 9, 2017, affidavits and submissions in compliance with the attached Order, and with the instructions provided in this Court's prior 49 Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 15, 2017. (Pskowski, R.)
|
|
Filing
49
Ruling (see attached) granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 30, 2016. (Overbey, C.)
|
|
Filing
28
RULING (see attached) on Defendants' 25 OBJECTION to Plaintiff's 23 Proffer of Additional Evidence. Defendants' objection to Plaintiff's proffer of additional evidence is SUSTAINED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's proffer is REJ ECTED and will not be considered by the Court. In accordance with the Court's 22 Order, cross-motions for summary judgment must be filed and served on or before March 25, 2015. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 11, 2015. (Pylman, J.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER (see attached) - The Court is not in a position to evaluate the contentions contained within the Parties' Supplemental Memoranda, 20 and 21 , or to apply governing case law to the facts of the case at bar, until Plaintiff makes known in detail the contents of the additional evidence she wishes to submit. Plaintiff is therefore directed to file and serve under seal (for privacy purposes) affidavits executed by all witnesses from whom Plaintiff wishes to elicit additional evidence t o supplement the administrative record. Those affidavits should be in the form that Plaintiff would wish the Court to consider on cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendants may then file such objections to that evidence as they may be advised t o make. The Court will resolve the issues and the case will then be ready for summary judgment practice under Rule 56, Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff must file and serve all affidavits consistent with this Order on or before Friday, January 17, 2014. D efendants must file and serve any objections to the admission of those proffered affidavits on or before Friday, January 31, 2014. Any opposition must be accompanied by a memorandum of legal authorities. Plaintiff may file a reply to Defendants 9; objections on or before Friday, February 7, 2014. Any reply must be accompanied by a memorandum of legal authorities. Cross-motions for summary judgment must be filed and served two weeks after the date of the Court's Ruling on Defendants' objections to Plaintiff's proffer of additional evidence. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 1/2/14.(Hornstein, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
