In Re: Alicia Rogers
Appellant: Alicia Rogers
Appellee: Eastern Savings Bank
Case Number: 3:2012cv00818
Filed: May 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Mark R. Kravitz
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 RULING denying 22 Motion to Dismiss. The ruling of the Bankruptcy Court (B'cy Doc. 57) is affirmed. Accordingly, the relief requested in the appeal filed by Appellant-Debtor Alicia Rogers (Doc. No. 1) is denied. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/28/2013. (Lewis, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Alicia Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Alicia Rogers
Represented By: George C. Tzepos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Eastern Savings Bank
Represented By: Robert Joseph Piscitelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?