Kokoska v. Hartford et al
| Philip Kokoska |
| City of Hartford, Daryl K. Roberts, J. Carroll and John Doe |
| 3:2012cv01111 |
| August 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER denying 145 Motion in Limine: For the reasons discussed in the attached Ruling, Plaintiffs Motion in Limine 145 will be DENIED. Evidence of Plaintiff's blood alcohol content on the date of the incident contained within Plaintiff's medical records may be admitted. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/6/15. (Fucci, S)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, Plaintiff's objection 133 to the Court's Ruling dated September 23, 2014, has been treated as a motion for reconsideration and is denied. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 10/22/2014.(Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER granting 102 Defendants' Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 103 Defendants' Motion in Limine; granting 104 Defendants' Motion in Limine; denying 105 Defendants' Motion in Limine; granting 106 Defendants' Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 9/23/2014. (Smith, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
