Tech-Sonic, Inc. v. Sonics & Materials, Inc.
| Tech-Sonic, Inc. |
| Sonics & Materials, Inc |
| 3:2012cv01376 |
| September 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
168
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court DISMISSES the case for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/20/2016. (Hillier, D.) Modified on 7/21/2016 (Shafer, J.).
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling: The 119 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED without prejudice. The plaintiff's 123 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The defendant's 126 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The defendant's 138 Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. The plaintiff's 135 Motion to Strike is DENIED.A telephonic status conference will be held on Au gust 24, 2015, at 3:00pm to discuss scheduling, including the deadline for the parties' joint trial memorandum and whether to hold a separate evidentiary hearing on the issue of jurisdiction in advance of trial. Chambers will email the parties with call-in instructions. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/7/2015. (Luedeman, R.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
