Rogers v. New Britain et al
| Vincent Rogers |
| City of New Britain, New Britain Water Department, Mark Zenobli, Gilbert Bligh, Ken Marzi, Jane Doe, John Doe and Other Unnamed Individuals |
| 3:2012cv01626 |
| November 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for Summary Judgment: The motion is denied with respect to hostile work environment and retaliation claims under Title VII and Section 1983 against the City of New Britain and the three individu al defendants in their official capacities, and against Zenobi and Marzi in their individual capacities; and with respect to the assault claim against Marzi. The motion is granted with respect to the Water Department and Bligh in his individual capac ity, and with respect to failure-to-promote or failure-to-hire or similar claims of disparate treatment. In sum, this case will proceed on (1) claims of hostile work environment and retaliation under Title VII and Section 1983 against the City of New Britain, Bligh in his official capacity, and Zenobi and Marzi in their official and individual capacities; and (2) the claim of assault against Marzi. Summary judgment is granted in all other respects.Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/17/2016. (Pollack, R.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
