Bristol Heights Assoc LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit Connecticut District Court Bristol Heights Assoc LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Company

Bristol Heights Assoc LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Bristol Heights Assoc LLC
Defendant:	Chicago Title Insurance Company
Case Number:	3:2012cv01658
Filed:	November 21, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Hartford
Presiding Judge:	Janet C. Hall
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 19, 2013	Filing 106 RULING granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part 81 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court imposes monetary sanctions on Attorney Zimmerman in the amount of $5,000.00 to be paid directly to Chicago Title in five monthly payments of $800 each, with the first payment due thirty days from the date of this Ruling. A final payment of $1,000 shall be made within 180 days from the date of this Ruling. Chicago Title is ordered to file a notice on this docket upon payment of the entire sanction. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/19/13. (Pesta, J.)
April 2, 2013	Filing 48 RULING granting 26 Motion for Protective Order; granting 26 Motion Motion to Quash Subpoenas; granting 26 Motion for Award of Expenses. Defendant will files a Motion for Award of Expenses with supporting documentation within fourteen days. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 4/2/13. (Esposito, A.)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 19, 2013

Filing 106 RULING granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part 81 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court imposes monetary sanctions on Attorney Zimmerman in the amount of $5,000.00 to be paid directly to Chicago Title in five monthly payments of $800 each, with the first payment due thirty days from the date of this Ruling. A final payment of $1,000 shall be made within 180 days from the date of this Ruling. Chicago Title is ordered to file a notice on this docket upon payment of the entire sanction. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/19/13. (Pesta, J.)

April 2, 2013

Filing 48 RULING granting 26 Motion for Protective Order; granting 26 Motion Motion to Quash Subpoenas; granting 26 Motion for Award of Expenses. Defendant will files a Motion for Award of Expenses with supporting documentation within fourteen days. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 4/2/13. (Esposito, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bristol Heights Assoc LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bristol Heights Assoc LLC
Represented By:	Stacie Zimmerman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Chicago Title Insurance Company
Represented By:	Michael J. Leventhal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?