Knox v. USA

Plaintiff: Anitra Knox
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 3:2012cv01741
Filed: December 12, 2012
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Chatigny
Referring Judge: Donna F. Martinez
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 27, 2016 126 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING granting, in part, and denying, in part, 94 Motion for Sanctions of Dismissal of the Lawsuit with Prejudice; and terminating 109 First Motion to Continue Proceedings. See attached Ruling for details. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 7/27/2016. (Katz, S.)
March 30, 2016 64 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting, absent objection, 58 Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Witness. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/30/2016. (Katz, S.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knox v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anitra Knox
Represented By: Anthony Lasala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?