Stiggle v. Arnone et al
| Eric J. Stiggle, Sr. |
| Leo Arnone, Salius, Martucci, Digenerro, Allan, Peter Murphy, Scott Erfe, John Patz, Perez and Miguel Ramirez |
| 3:2013cv00238 |
| February 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Robert N. Chatigny |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER. See attached ruling. For reasons and to the extent set forth in the attached ruling, the following motions are DENIED: Plaintiff's 57 Motion for Default Judgment; Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Order; Plaintiff's 59 Motion t o Compel; Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Order; Plaintiff's 61 Motion for Order; Plaintiff's 71 Motion for Sanctions; Plaintiff's 74 Motion to Compel; Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Default Entry 55(a); Plaintiff's 76 Motion for Order; Plaintiff's 78 Motion to Quash; Plaintiff's 83 Motion for Order; Plaintiff's 84 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Hearing; Plaintiff's 86 Mot ion for Sanctions; Plaintiff's 91 Motion for Leave to File; Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Protective Order; Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Order. For reasons and to the extent set forth in the attached ruling, the following motions are GRANTED: Defendants' 64 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff's 77 Motion for Extension of Time. Any motions for summary judgment shall be filed within 30 days of the Court's disposition of defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiff must file any response to defendants' motion to dismiss no later than September 26, 2014. So ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/26/2014. (Norman, D.)
|
|
Filing
23
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 13 Motion for Order; denying 20 Motion for Order, Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/813. (Blue, A.).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
