Molina v. Eagle Leasing Co

Defendant: Eagle Leasing Co
Plaintiff: Felix Molina
Case Number: 3:2013cv00413
Filed: March 27, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 6, 2014 45 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 MOTION to Dismiss by Eagle Leasing Co. Counts I (CFEPA) and IV (intentional infliction of emotional distress) are dismissed; Counts II (Title VII) and III (negligent supervision) remain. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 8/6/14. (Ladd-Smith, I.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Molina v. Eagle Leasing Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eagle Leasing Co
Represented By: Thomas E. Brennan
Represented By: Thomas P. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felix Molina
Represented By: William Sylvester Palmieri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.