Carpenter et al v. Shulman et al
| Daniel Carpenter and Grist Mill Capital LLC |
| Douglas Shulman, Victor Song, Steven Miller, Shaun Schrader and Unknown IRS Agents |
| 3:2013cv00563 |
| April 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
ORDER denying 142 Motion to Lift Stay; granting 146 Motion for Clarification and for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/22/2018. (Schneider, K)
|
|
Filing
150
AMENDED ORDER denying as moot 127 Motion to Dismiss; granting 129 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/20/2018. (Schneider, K)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER denying as moot 127 Motion to Dismiss; granting 129 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/29/2018. (Schneider, K)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion to Dismiss. The parties shall confer with one another and propose a scheduling order for discovery within two weeks of this Order. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/14/2016. (Buttrick, A.)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting and denying in part 38 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/04/2015. (Pannu, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
