McMiller v. Precision Metal Products, Inc.

Plaintiff: Diamilette McMiller
Defendant: Precision Metal Products, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00577
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 17, 2015 38 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 8/17/2015. (Dearing, S.)
April 10, 2014 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 22 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by Precision Metal Products, Inc. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 4/10/14. (Ladd-Smith, I.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McMiller v. Precision Metal Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diamilette McMiller
Represented By: John R. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Precision Metal Products, Inc.
Represented By: David A. Ryan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?