Leary v. Manstan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 27, 2018
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, defendants' Joint Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Doc. # 109 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants ' motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks sanctions against plaintiff's counsel. The motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks a costs and fees award pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505. Defendants are awarded $108,344.02 in costs and fees. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/27/2018. (Lombard, N.)
|February 7, 2017
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, defendants' motion for attorney's fees and costs (Doc. # 73 ) is DENIED without prejudice. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/7/2017. (Levenson, C.)
|July 15, 2015
ORDER. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 41 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 7/15/2015. (Norman, D.)
|February 9, 2015
ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS. See attached Order. Defendants' 27 motion to post a bond is DENIED. Plaintiff's 33 motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED. Plaintiff's 43 motion for summary judgment on the proposed addi tional copyright claim is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's 42 motion for summary judgment on defendants' CUTPA counterclaim is construed as a motion to dismiss, and the motion is GRANTED and the CUTPA counterclaim is DISMISSED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/9/2015. (Norman, D.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?