McConologue v. Smith & Nephew Inc

Plaintiff: John McConologue
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc
Case Number: 3:2013cv00880
Filed: June 19, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L. Bryant
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 24, 2014 32 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part the Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss, as set forth in the attached Memorandum of Decision. The Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, or by April 15, 2014. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/24/14. (Ives, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McConologue v. Smith & Nephew Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John McConologue
Represented By: John-Henry McKim Steele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc
Represented By: Thomas N. Lyons
Represented By: R. Cornelius Danaher, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?