Kaufman LLC v. Feinberg et al
| Kaufman LLC |
| Herb Feinberg, Catahama LLC and Fresh Harvest River LLC |
| 3:2013cv01259 |
| August 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Alfred V. Covello |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
482
ORDER granting 478 Motion for Directed Verdict; granting 479 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 480 Motion for Directed Verdict.For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling and Order, Plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict is GR ANTED, and Defendants' motion for a directed verdict is DENIED.As a result, judgment for Plaintiff will enter on the counterclaim and on Defendants' closely related affirmative defense to Plaintiff's claim.In addition, Plaintiff's motion to amend/correct the post-trial jury instructions and exhibit list is GRANTED.Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/21/2022. (Sullivan, John)
|
|
Filing
461
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 442 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 443 Motion in Limine; denying Plaintiff's 444 Motion in Limine; and denying Plaintiff's 453 Moti on in Limine.For the reasons stated in the attached Ruling and Order, Defendants' 442 motion to disqualify and to preclude narrative testimony is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Mr. Kaufman is not disqualified from serving as trial counsel, but Mr. Kaufman will be required to testify in a question-and-answer format.Defendants' 443 motion to preclude prejudicial and irrelevant evidence is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice to r enewal at trial. Defendants' motion to preclude evidence of Mr. Feinberg's wealth is denied without prejudice to renewal at trial. Attorney's fees evidence may be admitted to show generally why Mr. Kaufman sought an hourly fee arrangem ent but is otherwise precluded. Defendants' motion to preclude evidence of Mr. Feinberg's alleged failure to pay legal fees is granted. Defendant's motion to preclude evidence of the outcome of state bar grievance committee decisions i s also granted.Plaintiff's 444 motion to preclude prejudicial argument prior to establishment of a foundation regarding Mr. Kaufman's alleged unauthorized practice of law is DENIED.Plaintiff's 453 motion to preclude argument on irrelevant and prejudicial evidence related to his Harvard Law School education is DENIED.Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/24/2022. (Sullivan, John)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
