Black et al v. Owen et al
| Joseph N. Black and Ruth A. Black |
| Nicholas E. Owen, II, Capital Trust of Connecticut, LLC, Falmouth Ox-Bow Realty Trust, 4 WHIP LLC, 3060 Main, LLC, Wiklund I, LLC, Benchmark Mortgage, LLC, View Galore, LLC, 3333 Main, LLC, CT Property Mgmt, LLC, Taylor Property Management, LLC, 290 Franklin Avenue Development, LLC, Challenger II, LLC and 191 Second Avenue, LLC |
| 3:2014cv00023 |
| January 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert N. Chatigny |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
192
ORDER: A Telephonic Status Conference with Judge Martinez to discuss plaintiffs' Motion 174 for Preliminary Injunction and Motion 175 for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Charging Order or, Alternatively, Order in Aid of Execution is set f or 2/23/2018 at 11:45 AM. Plaintiffs' counsel shall initiate the conference call and shall have opposing counsel on the line when calling chambers at 860-240-3605. See attached Memorandum of Conference and Order. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 2/20/2018. (Greenspoon, L.)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER granting 180 Motion for a TRO. Please see attached Order for details. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2/9/18. (Jones, P.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
