Marte v. USA
Petitioner: |
Genero Marte |
Respondent: |
USA |
Case Number: |
3:2014cv00560 |
Filed: |
April 25, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Office: |
New Haven Office |
County: |
XX US, Outside State |
Presiding Judge: |
Janet C. Hall |
Nature of Suit: |
Motions to Vacate Sentence |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 2255 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
April 11, 2016 |
Filing
31
RULING granting 22 Motion for Reconsideration and sets aside its prior Judgment in this case to the extent necessary to assess the claim raised in Martes second Motion to Amend his section 2255 Petition (Doc. No. 29). ; granting 29 Motion to Am end/Correct, however, because the court finds that the claim contained in Martes second Motion to Amend does not state cognizable grounds for relief pursuant to section 2255 of title 28 of the United States Code, Martes section 2255 Petition (Doc. No. 1), as amended, is DENIED. A certificate of appealability will not issue.. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/11/2016. (Anastasio, F.)
|
July 7, 2015 |
Filing
17
RULING: The court grants 15 MOTION for Reconsideration re 14 Order on Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Genero Marte and denies Marte's Motion to Vacate (Doc. No. 1 ). As the court stated in its Ruling (Doc.No. 14 ), because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/7/2015. (Lewis, D)
|
February 23, 2015 |
Filing
14
RULING denying 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/23/2015. (Malone, P.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?