Ucar v. Transportation et al
||Dept of Transportation, James McCann, Rabih Barakat, Jon Hagert and Scott Hill
||May 28, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Connecticut
||New Haven Office
||Janet C. Hall
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 11, 2017
RULING: The defendants Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 122 ) is DENIED IN PART and TERMINATED AS MOOT IN PART. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/11/2017. (Lewis, D)
|August 12, 2016
RULING granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth above, the defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 63) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. In particular, the defendants Motion is g ranted, except with regard to the claims for disparate treatment related to Ucars 5-day suspension and the claims for retaliation related to the relocation of Ucars desk and the issuance of the negative 2012-2013 performance appraisal, as to which claims the Motion is denied. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 8/11/2016. (Lewis, D)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?