Harnage v. Dzurenda et al
| James A. Harnage |
| James Dzurenda, Theresa Lantz, Brian Murphy, Carol Salsbury, Robert Foltz, Cheryl Cepelak and Sydney Schulman |
| 3:2014cv00885 |
| June 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
ORDER granting 157 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the defendants consistent with the terms of this order and close the case. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03.31.22. (Powell, G.)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/28/2016. (Pollack, R.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying 15 Motion for Judgment; denying 16 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 20 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/7/2015. (Pollack, R.)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER: Motion for reconsideration 7 is GRANTED but the requested relief is DENIED. Motion for appointment of counsel 5 is DENIED without prejudice to refiling at a later stage of litigation. Motion to amend 8 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed t o docket the amended complaint, and to note the orders relating to service of the amended complaint, which are contained in this Ruling and Order. The case will proceed against defendants Dzurenda, Lantz, Murphy, Salisbury, Foltz and Cepelak on the equal protection claim in Count One only. All other claims were dismissed in the Initial Review Order and are not revived by their inclusion in the amended complaint. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 1/12/15. (Pollack, R.)
|
|
Filing
6
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER Dismissing 1 Complaint filed by James A. Harnage Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/9/2014.(Payton, R.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
