Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Elise Bentley
Defendant: Tri-State of Branford, LLC, Brad Pompilli, Dan Roe and Greensky Trade Credit, LLC
Case Number: 3:2014cv01157
Filed: August 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Chatigny
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ORDER granting 157 Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 8/6/2017. (Chen, C.)
August 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER regarding schedule for trial. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 8/4/2017.(Ghosh, S.)
May 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER denying 101 Motion for Reconsideration of 100 Order on Motion for Joinder and on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/6/2016. (Dearing, S.)
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER granting in part and denying in part the 68 Motion for Joinder. Plaintiff is not permitted to add Union First Market Bank as a party to the case but may amend her Complaint to add identity theft claims against Defendants Roe and Pompilli only. ORDER granting 80 GreenSky's Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety. All claims against GreenSky are dismissed. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/30/2015. (Dearing, S.)
April 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER denying 50 Motion To Add Union First Market Bank as a Defendant, and amending 27 Scheduling Order. Plaintiff may file additional motion(s) seeking to add Union First Market Bank as a Defendant to this case up to and including 5/1/2015. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 4/1/2015.(Dearing, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elise Bentley
Represented By: Joseph Robert Sastre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tri-State of Branford, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad Pompilli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Roe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greensky Trade Credit, LLC
Represented By: James A. Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?