Torcasio v. New Canaan Board of Education et al
| Antonia Torcasio |
| New Canaan Board of Education, Town of New Canaan and Bruce Gluck |
| 3:2015cv00053 |
| January 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Alvin W. Thompson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached order, the motion for summary judgment as to the counterclaim (Doc. No. 103 ) is hereby DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 3/20/17. (Rafferty, M.)
|
|
Filing
98
RULING denying 91 Motion for Reconsideration re 76 Order on Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/1/2016. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing
77
RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court GRANTS defendants' 59 Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash as to Mrs. Gluck, and DENIES as moot, defendants' 59 Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash as to Mr. Dicostanzo. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/26/2016. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing
76
RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court GRANTS, in part, and DENIES, in part, plaintiff's Motions for Order Compelling Discovery as to defendants Gluck (Doc. # 55 ), Town (Doc. # 56 ) and Board of Education (Doc. # 57 ). Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/25/2016. (Katz, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
