Olschafskie et al v. Enfield et al
| Amie Olschafskie |
| Town of Enfield, Enfield Police Dept., Carl Sferrazza, Mathew Worden, Jamie Yott, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2015cv00067 |
| January 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached, the 89 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, the 90 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and the 91 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/27/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, Defendants' 21 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as moot. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the Enfield Police Department as a defendant in this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/17/2015. (Osher, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
