Doe v. Hotchkiss School
| John Doe |
| Hotchkiss School |
| 3:2015cv00160 |
| February 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
417
ORDER granting 364 Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement; denying 380 Cross MOTION to Enforce The August 27, 2019 Settlement Agreement for the reasons stated in the attached ruling. Having determined that the Current Settlement Agreement is enforceable and that the respective rights of the parties under the Current Settlement Agreement now have been fulfilled, this case is DISMISSED and definitively closed. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 7/24/2020. (Conde, Djenab)
|
|
Filing
367
ORDER denying 361 Motion for Reconsideration for the reasons stated in the attached order. Mr. Doe must return all settlement funds as yet unused to his third set of counsel by March 27, 2020. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/24/2020. (Conde, Djenab)
|
|
Filing
319
ORDER denying 302 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 7/23/2019. (Washington, Gregory)
|
|
Filing
296
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 257 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/8/2019. (Washington, Gregory)
|
|
Filing
268
ORDER denying 211 Motion in Limine; denying 228 Sealed Motion; denying 229 Motion. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/30/2018. (Washington, Gregory)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER regarding documents reviewed in camera by the Court. In reference to 199 Joint MOTION for Discovery Conference per dkt 189 filed by John Doe, 242 Response filed by John Doe, 239 Status Conference,, 200 Response filed by Hotchkiss School, 206 Response, filed by John Doe, 241 Response filed by Hotchkiss School, 208 Response filed by Hotchkiss School, 205 Response, filed by Hotchkiss School, 201 Reply to Response to Motion filed by John Doe, 209 Response filed by John Doe Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/25/2018.(Washington, Gregory)
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER re 199 Joint MOTION for Discovery Conference. The Court ORDERS that Hotchkiss provide to the Court the disputed documents for in camera review by August 3, 2018. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 7/24/2018. (Riegel, J.)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER taking under advisement 151 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/9/2018. (Riegel, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. Hotchkiss School | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Doe | |
| Represented By: | Antonio Ponvert, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hotchkiss School | |
| Represented By: | Bradford S. Babbitt |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Elizabeth Dion |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey J. White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
